Influencers accept total visibility of private life as a condition of their livelihood

Evidence

Unlike celebrities who loathe being tailed by the paparazzi, Maples understands her livelihood as bound together with making her private life visible to millions of anonymous viewers. She does not hide behind some belief that she is an untouchable artist, that she deserves privacy beyond what she does for a living. She is merely bothered by the lack of accuracy in these comments (even though some of the comments, like the one cited above, are not far off). — Grant Bollmer, Katherine Guinness, The Influencer Factory, 132

Categorization

• XREF: Mia Maples as a case study for the Corpocene: private life is the production site; useful for the reader’s real-creator analysis.