Individuals routinely have law made for them without personal consent in our legal system.

Evidence

There is no doubt, is there, that as a result of the Campbe decision Mr. Kirk had had a law made for him pursuant to the provisions of the private *code of government” to which he was subject? To what extent does this represent an anomaly, and to what extent a normal occurrence, in our legal system? — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process, 4407

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Private law binding non-consenting parties is unobjectionable when the disadvantaged had no prior claim — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 4414; General incorporation laws dissolved a major instrument of social control — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 4449; Corporate power lets private groups make binding decisions with continuing effect — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 4445 (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• No branch of law remains purely private in modern legal systems #corroborates (0.85) — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law, 777
• Official agencies can regulate private law-making without supplanting it #qualifies (0.80) — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process, 4260