Individual lateralization abilities share variance even after age effects are removed

Evidence

Table 2 Pearson’s correlation coefficients and p -values (in parentheses) for the data shown in Fig. 2 . The second line of each entry indicates the values when the effect of age was partialled out. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were marked as italic characters ITD ILD TIME Low Freq. ILD 0.59 (< 0.001) 0.59 (< 0.001) TIME − 0.10 (0.520) − 0.17 (0.283) 0.16 (0.318) 0.09 (0.572) LEVEL 0.28 (0.069) 0.27 (0.079) 0.53 (< 0.001) 0.52 (< 0.001) 0.03 (0.825) − 0.16 (0.316) High Freq. ILD 0.55 (< 0.001) 0.56 (< 0.001) TIME 0.30 (0.053) 0.33 (0.031) 0.08 (0.632) 0.16 (0.325) LEVEL 0.12 (0.436) 0.12 (0.462) 0.43 (0.004) 0.52 (< 0.001) 0.28 (0.064) 0.08 (0.616) Table 2 Pearson’s correlation coefficients and p -values (in parentheses) for the data shown in Fig. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1074 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Lateralization performance on ITD and ILD tasks correlates even after age is controlled — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1074; Huggins pitch and temporal-structure tasks share variance that ITD lateralization does not.; Peripheral coding efficiency drives lateralization except for low-frequency ITD — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1023 (+1 more)

Broader Connections