IMF austerity economists reused the fascist playbook of labor discipline

Evidence

In 2010, Alesina and his colleague Silvia Ardagna, chief European economist at Barclays, offered the same exact playbook as their fascist predecessors. They proposed supply-side reforms to deal with the European financial crisis, emphasizing the close link between fiscal austerity and industrial austerity as a way to discipline workers and increase investments. Cuts in social programs lead to reductions in public jobs and public wages, putting increased pressure on workers in the private sphere. In both cases, “the wage demanded by unions for private sector workers decreases, increasing profits, investments, and competitiveness.” Later, Alesina suggested that for the good of all, policies of “wage moderation,” “the cancellation of the Christmas related extra-payments,” and raising the retirement age are desirable. Alesina’s bitter comment foreshadowed vituperative policy debate in the runup to at least one election: “If the French think that they can keep retiring at 60, they’re kidding themselves.” — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 231

Categorization

  • SEED: The claim that modern IMF economists mirror their fascist predecessors’ supply-side ‘discipline’ framing is a strong contrarian essay angle.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The continuity between fascist-era and contemporary mainstream austerity economics—same causal logic, same rhetoric, different century—is a genuinely paradigm-shifting observation worth sitting with.
  • XREF: connects to: International economists forged austerity as a deliberate antiworker project — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 194; Fascist austerity dismantled postwar gains and re-separated economics from politics — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism: An Intervention, 193; Alesina’s IMF playbook explicitly deploys austerity to discipline workers — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism: An Intervention, 231 (+13 more)

Broader Connections