Imaginative totality of a country is always built from partial individual experience

Evidence

But the matter of the ‘missing bits’ is not so easily settled, purely as a problem begging for a formal resolution. It is at least arguable that no one ever knows their country whole, regardless of how much of their life is or is not actually lived within its borders; that the imaginative apprehension of totality is always constructed on the basis of those bits and slices of concrete experience which constitute any individual’s life, migrant or not; that what eventually matters about any experience, felt or narrated, is not its partiality, because direct experience is always partial, but the quality of the particular ‘bits’ which constitute it and those others which remain outside the felt experience and therefore outside one’s imaginative capacity as well. If one has ‘known Pakistan for a long ti.rpe’ and yet, because of circumstance, ‘learned’ it only ‘by slices’, the question naturally arises: which ‘slices’ has one chosen to ‘learn’? — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 543

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the epistemological stakes distinguishing genuine partiality from self-serving postmodern fragment claims.
  • XREF: connects to: Language and culture cannot confer national belonging without shared experience — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 572; Nationhood is constructed through imagination, not just sovereignty — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 817; Estrangement from one’s own culture enables genuine judgment of it and others (+1 more)

Broader Connections