Ideological hegemony substitutes for physical coercion in stable hierarchies

Evidence

Everything else being equal, we postulate that the greater the degree to which dominants can induce subordinates to endorse self-demeaning ideologies such as anti- Black racism, the less physi-cal force or threat of force (i.e., terror) will be necessary in order to keep the hierarchical group relationships in place. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 3223

Categorization

  • XREF: Reciprocal to Horkheimer’s point that surplus repression and ideology sustain domination; also bears directly on the strategic-essentialism question of whether subordinates can use identity claims without entrenching the system. — connects to: Self-endorsed ideologies substitute for physical coercion in hierarchy; Modern states replace the mechanical bloc with active hegemony by dominant groups — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1867; Formal democratic liberties rest on an unseen foundation of physical coercion — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 346 (+7 more)
  • SEED: Angle: the arithmetic of domination — how much ideological co-optation price can be traded off against how much police violence is measurable.

Broader Connections