Idealist and orthodox-Marxist critics alike denied Marx’s Hegelian dialectical lineage

Evidence

Actually, the similarity between Croce’s and Korsch’s positions ceases to be quite so surprising when one remembers that in this case both idealist and materialist set out from a basic denial of the relationship between Marx and Hegel: Croce because he is himself a Hegelian and not a Marxist, Korsch because he believes that genuine Marxism involves the thoroughgoing eradication of Hegelian dialectical elements, which for him are still speculative. — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 715

Categorization

• XREF: Opposes Croce and Korsch against the Frankfurt line (Adorno, Lukács) for which the Hegelian element is exactly the living core of Marxism — the central fault line in the reader’s stated interest. — connects to: Marx’s inversion of Hegel is oppositional, not a simple turn from idealism to materialism; Marx’s core socialism can stand without his Hegelian dialectic — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2857; Gramsci distinguishes Marx’s rational dialectic from a merely materialist inversion of Hegel — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 2774 (+1 more)

Broader Connections

• Marx’s inversion of Hegel is oppositional, not a simple turn from idealism to materialism #responds-to (0.85)
• Kierkegaard and Marx rejected Hegel for opposite reasons, individual versus social. #expands (0.85) — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 173
• Gramsci distinguishes Marx’s rational dialectic from a merely materialist inversion of Hegel #complicates (0.80) — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 2774
• Marx’s core socialism can stand without his Hegelian dialectic #complicates (0.75) — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2857