Human survival competence depends on inherited knowledge, not innate wit alone

Evidence

Let’s face it, chances are your human team would lose, and probably lose badly, to a bunch of monkeys, despite your team’s swollen crania and ample hubris. If not for surviving as hunter-gatherers in Africa, the continent where our species evolved, what are our big brains for anyway? How did we manage to expand into all those diverse environments across the globe? — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success, 41

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the core premise — that individual human intelligence is insufficient absent cultural inheritance — which the conformist-bias mechanism chapters build upon.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s coercion-vulnerability question: if modern humans are individually fragile without inherited know-how, then who controls transmission of that know-how holds leverage. — connects to: Forager water-procurement know-how is nonobvious cultural knowledge that genes could not supply — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 255; Individual intelligence alone cannot sustain human survival without cumulative cultural knowledge — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 135; Humans dominate diverse habitats despite physical weakness and sparse innate knowledge — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 37 (+8 more)

Broader Connections