Human subjectivity itself is constituted by the social process of production.

Evidence

The organic composition of man is growing. That which determines subjects as means of production and not as living purposes, increases with the proportion of machines to variable capital. The pat phrase about the ‘mechanization’ of man is deceptive because it thinks of him as something static which, through an ‘influence’ from outside, an adaptation to conditions of production external to him, suffers certain deformations. But there is no substratum beneath such ‘deformations’, no ontic interior on which social mechanisms merely act externally: the deformation is not a sickness in men but in the society which begets its children with the ‘hereditary taint’ that biologism projects on to nature. — Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia, 254

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Marx’s organic composition of capital, and to the arguments against the ‘substratum’ view of the subject that runs through Frankfurt School debates with Lukács and later Habermas. — connects to: Humans are constituted by their social relations rather than an intrinsic essence — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 2517; Reality is produced through collective work and action — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on…, 386; Reified social wholes are objective forces that decide individual existence — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 735 (+11 more)
  • DEFINE: Adorno transfers Marx’s ‘organic composition of capital’ from capital to the human subject itself.

Broader Connections