How and what one believes are inextricably entwined, contra Allport’s separation

Evidence

However, research has also suggested that how one believes and what one believes (or does not believe) may not be as clearly separable as Allport thought. … Scores on his Intrinsic scale have been found to be highly correlated (typically 0.50 or higher) with scores on Orthodoxy and Fundamentalism scales (Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 1992; Batson et al., 1993). — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2574 (#expands, via linked claim)

However, research has also suggested that how one believes and what one believes (or does not believe) may not be as clearly separable as Allport thought. — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2574 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

However, research has also suggested that how one believes and what one believes (or does not believe) may not be as clearly separable as Allport thought. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 2574 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: How one believes and what one believes are inextricably entwined — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2574; How a person believes religion is not separable from what they believe — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 2574; How and what people believe religiously are not separable dimensions — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2574 (+2 more)

Broader Connections