Housing-market discrimination makes purportedly free market choices illusory

Evidence

“Free market” explanations, however, are notoriously incomplete. As others have persuasively argued, markets are social institutions shaped by various levels of state and private control. Choices and preferences made in the “market” domain are, as Cass Sunstein explains, “endogenous rather than exogenous”—a function of current information, consumption patterns, existing legal rules, social norms, and culture. For instance, the historical and present reality of race discrimination in the housing market inevitably affects individual preferences and mobility in the housing arena. Given this history and present reality, the “free” nature of market choices must be called into question. — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up, 317

Categorization

  • XREF: The endogeneity-of-preferences move parallels the social-construction arguments run in earlier polyad sources on race and institutions. — connects to: Market-dynamics siting outcomes remain racist once housing discrimination is factored in — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 336; Free-market explanations fail because markets are social institutions shaped by state power and discrimination; Housing discrimination creates a negative feedback loop harming Black property values — Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning: The…, 451 (+11 more)

Broader Connections