Horkheimer saw the ego’s self-preservation drive as ultimately self-destructive.

Evidence

Moreover, the struggle of the subjectively rational ego against nature, both external and internal, had been completely counterproductive in the end. “The moral is plain,” Horkheimer concluded; “the apotheosis of the ego and the principle of self-preservation as such culminate in the utter insecurity of the individual, in his complete negation.” — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 816

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes Dialectic of Enlightenment’s thesis that enlightenment instrumental reason inverts into myth and domination. — connects to: Self-domination destroys the very subject self-preservation aims to save — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 62; Rationality of the actor and of the action can diverge, making reason self-destructive. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 423; Cornered destructiveness stops distinguishing self-destruction from outward violence — Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia: Reflections from…, 118 (+2 more)

Broader Connections