Horkheimer and Marcuse divided labour by habit, Marcuse taking intellectual history

Evidence

As I see it at the moment, Marcuse’s article will deal mainly with the ideology of progress and its relation to the development of the individual, while mine will concentrate on technology and experimental psychology.’ Marcuse was therefore to deal with matters related to the history of ideas, following a division of labour which had in the meantime become customary between them. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 318

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Marcuse could oppose Horkheimer’s conceptions yet still revere the work — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1250; Horkheimer steered Marcuse from Heideggerian phenomenology toward critical Marxism — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 283
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Marcuse could oppose Horkheimer’s conceptions yet still revere the work — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1250; Horkheimer steered Marcuse from Heideggerian phenomenology toward critical Marxism — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 283