Horkheimer and Adorno anchored their critiques in different measures, transcendent ideas versus the non-identical
Evidence
Where Adorno made what was unrestricted and non-identical the measure of his critique, Horkheimer referred to ideas which pointed beyond given realities, to contemplations which raised themselves above self-interest and expediency, to love as it was symbolized by Romeo and Juliet, to the image glimpsed between imagination and memory of an economically independent, responsible and thoughtful citizen. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 336
Categorization
- DEEPTHINKING: Names the precise fault line between the two principals of the Frankfurt School at the moment they co-authored their most famous book.
- XREF: Connects to the reader’s other Frankfurt School material on Horkheimer’s own idealist residue and Adorno’s non-identical. — connects to: Horkheimer and Adorno anchored their critique of reason in different ideals — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1308; Adorno’s critique of immanence aimed at the non-identical, the new, the transcendent — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1303; Adorno fused Hegelian determinate negation with Horkheimer’s Jewish monotheism to justify Critical Theory. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 534
- yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Horkheimer and Adorno anchored their critique of reason in different ideals — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1308; Adorno’s critique of immanence aimed at the non-identical, the new, the transcendent — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1303; Adorno fused Hegelian determinate negation with Horkheimer’s Jewish monotheism to justify Critical Theory. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 534
Broader Connections
- Horkheimer and Adorno anchored their critique of reason in different ideals
#corroborates(0.95) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1308