Horkheimer’s late politics grew reactionary on decolonization and Vietnam.

Evidence

In any case, the outcome was an attitude that was reactionary in more and more respectsfor example, in the 1950s he rejected the Algerian struggle for liberation, and in the 1960s he rejected criticism of the American war in Vietnam. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 497

Categorization

• XREF: Connects to the Frankfurt School volume’s account of the Horkheimer-Adorno turn away from radical politics after the war. — connects to: Horkheimer’s fear of ruthless critique drove him to reactionary political positions — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2016; Late Horkheimer embraced anti-Communist and pro-American rhetoric — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 1726; Horkheimer privately despised his era yet publicly promoted bourgeois traditions — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2112
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Horkheimer’s fear of ruthless critique drove him to reactionary political positions — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2016; Late Horkheimer embraced anti-Communist and pro-American rhetoric — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 1726; Horkheimer privately despised his era yet publicly promoted bourgeois traditions — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2112

Broader Connections

• Horkheimer’s fear of ruthless critique drove him to reactionary political positions #expands (0.92) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 2016