Historical coinage rebellions show money’s nature provokes unprincipled, disproportionate demands

Evidence

A coinage rebellion in Braunschweig in 1499 is an excellent illustration of the lack of principle which is encouraged by the nature of money and which prevents the limitation of demands. The government wanted only the good coinage to be valid, whereas previously bad coinage had also existed. And thereupon the same persons who had taken only good coinage for their goods and labor revolted violently because their payments in bad coinage were no longer accepted! The frequent coexistence of good and bad coinage provides the fullest opportunities for the immoderation of avarice, compared to which the most intense other passions seem to have only a partial hold over the emotions. Even in China there have been revolutions because the government paid in bad coinage but collected taxes in good coinage. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 458

Categorization

  • SEED: A concrete historical anecdote (Braunschweig 1499, Chinese coin revolts) that could anchor a popular essay on how abstract financial media distort moral proportionality.
  • CANDY: The Braunschweig 1499 rebellion joke — people who accepted only good coinage revolting when bad coin was abolished — is a darkly funny, tweetable historical vignette.
  • XREF: connects to: The colonial currency’s association with taxes drove local resistance to it — Fanny Pigeaud_ Ndongo Samba Sylla, Africa’s Last Colonial Currency, 58; Fights over worthless chips reveal that fighting itself motivates conflict — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 299; The 1848 financial crisis revealed an antagonism between credit and specie money — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An…, 1658 (+1 more)

Broader Connections