Historical change arrives as a qualitative leap, not gradual growth
Evidence
A question remains, provided we genuinely shed the doctrine of progress: How could humanity throughout at least six thousand years of recorded history undergo change, as it did, without having to experience the dimension of change as exists in modernity? β Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism, 409 (
#qualifies, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: History changes only through historical means, not eternal truths β David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: Anβ¦, 261; Qualitative change would catastrophically transform prevailing technical rationality β Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in theβ¦, 802; Historical change alters how invariant productive elements combine, not the elements themselves. (+9 more)
Broader Connections
- Transformative change is gradual within continuities, not clean breaks
#contradicts(0.95) - Historical change alters how invariant productive elements combine, not the elements themselves.
#expands(0.80) - Pre-modern societies underwent change without experiencing it as accelerated rupture
#qualifies(0.80) β Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism, 409 - Ideology changes by reweighting old elements, not by imposition
#expands(0.75) β Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 629 - Economic base determines superstructure and historical epochs change through structural contradiction
#expands(0.72) - The myth of inevitable change masks the class-serving reality of historical rupture
#contradicts(0.72)