Hereditary victimhood functions as a blank cheque for moral righteousness

Evidence

There is another quality, though, claimed by the ‘victim by proxy’ – one of belonging to a sui generis ‘aristocracy of victimhood’ (that is, having a hereditary claim to the sympathy and ethical indulgence owed to those who suffer). That status can be, and often is, brandished as an equivalent of the medieval indulgentsia or the contemporary ‘blank cheque’: a signed-in-advance certificate of moral righteousness. Whatever the legatees of the victims do is guaranteed to be moral (or at least ethically correct) as long as it can be shown that it was done in order to stave off a repetition of the lot visited on their ancestors; or as long as it can be shown to be psychologically understandable, nay ‘normal’, in view of the inherited trauma; the super-susceptibility of the hereditary bearers of victimhood to the threat of a new victimization. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 667

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the concept of an ‘aristocracy of victimhood’ as a claim to hereditary moral indulgence that pre-authorizes future actions.
  • XREF: Connects directly to the Islamophobia toolkit concern with how claimed victimhood is weaponized politically; parallels the way hegemonic narratives of past persecution legitimize present exclusion. — connects to: Hereditary victimhood operates through imagined memory, not genetic or family ties. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 675; Ancestral-calling logic forces immorality to be preserved across generations; Perpetrators can sincerely believe their own cruelty is ethical vengeance. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 671

Broader Connections