Heidegger expressed genuinely dialectical structures in an undialectical way.

Evidence

In Heidegger’s conception of Being, in which mediation was as it were stretched out into a non-objective objectivity, a transitive transcendent, Adorno saw an ontological distortion of the dialectical fact that Dasein, the subject as a constituent, already presupposes the facticity that it constitutes. In his view, Heidegger had attempted to express dialectical structures in an undialectical way, and to do justice to the suspended character of philosophy which consists neither of vérités de raison nor of vérités de fait. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 627

Categorization

• DEFINE: The formulation ‘dialectical structures in an undialectical way’ and the ‘suspended character of philosophy’ are precise critical-theory vocabulary worth retaining.
• XREF: Resonates with the earlier Frankfurt material on reason as an organ of self-preservation and on Kant’s suspended philosophical standing. — connects to: Adorno read Heidegger as expressing dialectical structures undialectically — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2510; Heidegger flattens dialectical time to prove it is flattened; Adorno judged Heidegger’s Hegel reading as rigorously dialectical despite its ontology errors — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 133 (+1 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Adorno read Heidegger as expressing dialectical structures undialectically — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2510; Heidegger flattens dialectical time to prove it is flattened; Adorno judged Heidegger’s Hegel reading as rigorously dialectical despite its ontology errors — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 133 (+1 more)

Broader Connections

• Adorno read Heidegger as expressing dialectical structures undialectically #corroborates (0.95) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 2510
• Adorno judged Heidegger’s Hegel reading as rigorously dialectical despite its ontology errors #complicates (0.80) — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 133