Heidegger’s late thought offers nothing for reuniting the rationality positivism split.

Evidence

Nothing remained in his work that could inspire any thinking concerned with the reintegrationprecisely through the analysis of science and technology and of a society shaped by having science and technology as its principal productive forcesof the rationality that had been bisected by positivism. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 625

Categorization

• DEFINE: Defines the central Habermasian project: re-integrating a rationality bisected by positivism via analysis of science, technology, and their productive-force role.
• XREF: connects to: Heidegger’s thought gives no guidance for social practice or scientific interpretation — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2499; Vienna Circle positivists used Heidegger’s lecture as proof that metaphysics is meaningless. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 415
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Heidegger’s thought gives no guidance for social practice or scientific interpretation — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2499; Vienna Circle positivists used Heidegger’s lecture as proof that metaphysics is meaningless. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 415