Hegel’s System is immanently temporalized through its own double perspective

Evidence

No study has yet appeared which is dedicated to uncovering what these two ‘great moments of subjectivity’ promise: nothing less than the immanent temporalization of the System. For these two moments do not belong to the same time. By configuring itself in both perspectives, Hegelian thought announces the arrival (l’advenue) of a new time. And here waits the underlying question of my work. If there is a time that is the synthesis of its own content, thus as much a logical form as a chronological one, how can we explain its nature? — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 272

Categorization

• SEED: The question — a time that is both logical form and chronological, synthesis of its own content — is the seed of the book itself; usable as an essay thesis about time as self-relation.
• QUESTION: How would the ‘immanent temporalization’ map onto the neuroplastic account the reader works from, where brain structure is itself processual form?
• XREF: connects to: Hegel’s temporal movement spans both logical structure and historical unfolding — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 278; Hegelian time is dialectically differentiated and never fixed by its moments — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 249; Hegel’s Man-God-Philosopher triad are temporal perspectives, not fixed substances — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 287 (+9 more)

Broader Connections

• Hegel’s Man-God-Philosopher triad are temporal perspectives, not fixed substances #exemplifies (0.82) — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 287
• Hegelian appearance is always being-for-another in dual temporal and supersensible senses #expands (0.80) — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 878
• Hegel alone achieved consciousness of contradictions within a single system #corroborates (0.72)