Hearing loss makes listener opinions unreliable no matter how experienced

Evidence

Hearing loss is an occupational hazard in many professions, unfortunately including professional audio. At the very least, mixers exposed to periods of very loud sound incur temporary hearing loss. Repetitions of such exposures result in permanent hearing loss. As illustrated in Section 3.2 and discussed in detail in Chapter 17, both of these seriously affect what is heard in mixes, and it is not consistent. Judgments of sound quality are impaired. Paradoxically, the people who do the mixes may not be the best judges of the results. — , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-…, 1246 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

In terms of “overall sound quality,” there is some disagreement between the groups. Those with normal hearing preferred all of the channels running at or close to reference levels; anything else is a degradation. Note that the difference between all three channels running at reference level, and the L and R loudspeakers attenuated by 3 dB, is trivial (and statistically insignificant). In total contrast, listeners with hearing disabilities, having difficulty understanding speech, clearly voted for progressively more monophonic sound. They obviously associated speech intelligibility with sound quality. — , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-…, 1437 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Aging degrades listening judgment reliability despite accumulated expertise.; Hearing-impaired professionals give confident but unreliable sound quality judgments.; Hearing-impaired listeners equate speech intelligibility with overall sound quality. — , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-…, 1437 (+10 more)

Broader Connections