Gramsci’s political divergence from Bordiga centered on the theory-practice relation.

Evidence

At all events, it seems clear that such differences as there were concerned not so much questions of overall analysis, or of strategy even, as the relation between theory and practice. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 145

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

Related

• Gramsci’s early differences with Bordiga concerned theory-practice relations and party strategy. (similarity 0.90)
• Gramsci’s philosophy of praxis links theory inseparably to practice and action (similarity 0.84)
• Gramsci broke from Bordiga’s immobilism while keeping his own critique of Comintern (similarity 0.83)
• Gramsci read the Bolsheviks as living Marx’s living thought against dogmatic determinism (similarity 0.83)
• Gramsci opposed Comintern policy in 1923 as firmly as Bordiga did. (similarity 0.82)
• Gramsci’s leadership combined anti-sectarian party norms with mass responsiveness (similarity 0.81)
• Gramsci backed Bordiga partly from fear of a rightward replacement (similarity 0.81)
• Philosophy of praxis shifted from mechanistic fatalism toward activist unity of theory and practice. (similarity 0.81)
• Gramsci’s hegemony opposes domination and also corporate economic phase (similarity 0.81)
• Marxism’s educational mission to the masses absorbed its intellectual strength (similarity 0.80)
• Marxist currents widely subordinated theory to practice’s needs (similarity 0.80)
• The dialectic only functions when philosophy of praxis stands as an integral philosophy. (similarity 0.80)
• Tracing how Marxism got absorbed into other philosophies requires delicate analysis of hidden connections. (similarity 0.79)
• Incarceration’s isolation from source texts shaped Gramsci’s theoretical work. (similarity 0.79)
• Gramsci adds concepts classical Marxism lacked for explaining modern society. (similarity 0.79)