Gramsci’s hegemony opposes domination and also corporate economic phase
Related
- Early warnings of American hegemony over Europe triggered Gramsci’s analysis (similarity 0.87)
- Gramsci designed hegemony as a bulwark against economic reductionism. (similarity 0.83)
- Schooling matters for hegemony because intellectuals depend on it economically (similarity 0.83)
- Hegemony must be won before power is seized, not merely imposed by force after (similarity 0.82)
- Hegemony’s thesis absorbs opposition rather than being transcended by it (similarity 0.82)
- Hegemony means tendential balance, not absolute class victory (similarity 0.82)
- Hegemony can be achieved through dominance over the work process. (similarity 0.82)
- Gramsci adds concepts classical Marxism lacked for explaining modern society. (similarity 0.82)
- Hegemony is an unstable equilibrium requiring continuous re-securing. (similarity 0.82)
- Gramsci’s hegemony concept rejects economic reductionism and reframes power non-coercively. (similarity 0.82)
- Gramsci never separated hegemony and consent from force and domination (similarity 0.82)
- Hegemony is an unstable equilibrium never certain of success (similarity 0.81)
- Capitalism depends on a noncapitalist world whose possession is imperialism’s core project (similarity 0.81)
- For Gramsci, hegemony is the antidote to vulgar economism. (similarity 0.81)
- Hegemony is a contestable, unstable equilibrium, never permanently secured. (similarity 0.81)