Google deliberately sought freedom from both market governance and democratic law.
Evidence
Digital dispossession is not an episode but a continuous coordination of action, material, and technique, not a wave but the tide itself. Google’s leaders understood from the start that their success would require continuous and pervasive fortifications designed to defend their “repetitive sin” from contest and constraint. They did not want to be bound by the disciplines typically imposed by the private market realm of corporate governance or the democratic realm of law. In order for them to assert and exploit their freedom, democracy would have to be kept at bay. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 319
Categorization
- XREF: Connects to the earlier theme of ‘the collision’ and to later chapters on the overthrow of the social contract; the ‘repetitive sin’ phrase anchors the anti-democratic thrust. — connects to: Google responds to resistance with staged superficial compliance rather than genuine reform — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 441; Google’s observational dominance lets it bypass social relations with automated compulsion. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 688; Google treats public resistance as an obstacle to be managed commercially — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 442 (+1 more)
Broader Connections
- Google institutionalized surveillance capitalism by simply declaring its right to take experience as data
#expands(0.82) — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1078 - Google responds to resistance with staged superficial compliance rather than genuine reform
#corroborates(0.80) — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 441 - Google’s observational dominance lets it bypass social relations with automated compulsion.
#expands(0.75) — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 688 - Google treats public resistance as an obstacle to be managed commercially
#expands(0.72) — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 442