Geographic separation does not prove noninfringing status under patent law

Evidence

This argument begs the Court to fall into the logical fallacy of the undistributed middle. As a matter of logic, the fact that some SL1001 are noninfringing because they are made, used and sold outside the United States does not mean that all SL1001 exciters are noninfringing no matter where they are made, used or sold, any more than the fact that because fish cannot fly and penguins cannot fly, penguins must therefore be fish. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 860

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 860
• XREF: connects to: Relevant geographic market definition is a question of fact, not law — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1236; Joint purchase does not prove coercion or an illegal tie — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1179; Valid purposes in two distinct legal contexts do not justify merging them — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 849 (+1 more)

Library Connections

• Joint purchase does not prove coercion or an illegal tie #complicates (0.50) — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1179
• Valid purposes in two distinct legal contexts do not justify merging them #complicates (0.50) — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 849
• Pending separate lawsuits do not defeat the finality of a judgment in one action #complicates (0.45) — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1153

Broader Connections

• Relevant geographic market definition is a question of fact, not law #corroborates (0.55) — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1236