Geographic quotas can function as covert racial discrimination that is nearly impossible to prove

Evidence

Geographical quotas constitute a common and often legitimate means of determining the composition of a student body, and one which may affect the proportion of minorities. Insofar as they serve to broaden the horizons of youth they may be valuable, but when one seeks to take advantage of the fact that minorities are often concentrated in particular state, they may become covert means of illegal discrimination. Since it is impractical to set up ratios based solely on state population, it becomes a matter of some difficulty for the agency to prove that these quotas are not bona fide. β€” Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process, 1704

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Proving discrimination requires showing manifest acts, not just prejudiced officials’ beliefs β€” Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 1691; Changing the geographic unit of analysis can make racial siting disparities statistically vanish; Refusing to count by race masks ongoing structural racial restriction (+6 more)

Broader Connections