Fusing religion with nationalism amplifies collective violence and self-sacrifice.

Evidence

As Marvin and Ingle (1996, 1999) put it, both religion and nationalism have the potential to organize “killing energy” and promote blood sacrifice. A fusion of the two is thus likely to generate greater violence and willingness on behalf of individuals to sacrifice themselves in the name of the collective. — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized, 138

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly advances the reader’s research on whether sacralized political conflict becomes resistant to compromise; connects to sacred-values mechanism literature and to Dubner/Appleby weak-versus-thick religion framing. — connects to: Evangelical churches fuse patriotic and military ritual with Christian worship to sacralize the nation — Andrew L. Whitehead; Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God, 36; Christian nationalism today is premillennial and frames war as God-sanctioned conquest. — Andrew L. Whitehead; Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God, 82; Religious legitimation increases both the exclusivity and violence of ethnic nationalism. — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized:…, 131 (+12 more)
  • QUESTION: Marvin & Ingle’s ‘killing energy’ framing deserves follow-up on how fusion, rather than either element alone, raises the violence ceiling.

Broader Connections