French ethnic-based policy claimed each people deserved its own chief

Evidence

In principle, it can only be advantageous to choose a native chief from a family of the ethnic group that he will represent; indeed, we do not have the right to sacrifice the future of one race to the future of another; each people must conserve its autonomy relative to a neighboring people; to take the side of one tribe, which was formerly dominant over that of a conquered tribe, would be contrary to the ideas of justice and liberalism that have always presided over our action in Africa. Additionally, by al- lowing each ethnic group to evolve within its own particular mentality, by preserving as much as possible the particularism of the tribe, we are furthering the birth of individual effort within each group, and thus lib- erating the entire group from the religious or political influence of the neighboring group. — Alice L. Conklin, A Mission to Civilize_ The Republican…, 392

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • SEED: The politique des races is a striking example of how ostensibly liberal anti-colonial rhetoric could engineer ethnic fragmentation — an angle for an essay on how ‘ethnic autonomy’ discourse maps colonial divide-and-rule.

Broader Connections