Free speech serves the powerless while censorship protects the powerful

Evidence

The real value of free speech, in other words, is not to those who possess power, but to those who want to challenge them. And the real value of censorship is to those who do not wish their authority to be challenged. Once we give up on the right to offend in the name of ‘tolerance’ or ‘respect’, we constrain our ability to challenge those in power, and therefore to challenge injustice. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 656

Categorization

  • XREF: This reframes the anti-Islamophobia speech-restriction agenda as serving power rather than protecting Muslims — a sharp inversion of the Runnymede/decolonial framing that the reader is tracking. — connects to: Runnymede supports free speech while demanding media rules of engagement; Free expression is meaningless without the social power to be heard — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 355; Discoursing on power differs fundamentally from being silenced by it (+4 more)
  • APHORISMS: A timeless, quotable line about the political function of free speech versus censorship. The real value of free speech is to those who would challenge power.

Broader Connections