Fraser distinguishes three institutional forms of misrecognition independent of victims’ feelings

Evidence

Fraser identifies three status-based, as opposed to psychological, definitions and processes of misrecognition. First is a general practice of cultural domination; second is a pattern of nonrecognition, which is the equivalent of being rendered invisible; and third is disrespect, or being routinely maligned or disparaged in stereotypic public and cultural representations (Fraser 1998: 7). Fraser is much more comfortable identifying and relying on these structural, social, and symbolic indicators of misrecognition or lack of respect, as they do not rely on the psychological interpretation or feeling of the victim. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 77

Categorization

• DEFINE: The three forms (domination, nonrecognition-as-invisibility, disrespect) give the reader an operational checklist of misrecognition harms.
• XREF: connects to: Fraser reframes misrecognition as institutional status subordination rather than psychological harm — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 76; Fraser’s three status forms map cleanly onto harms suffered by nature — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 466