Formalist short-lyric analysis conceals its practitioners’ reactionary class ideology

Evidence

The favourite New Critical text was the short lyric, precisely because the lyric could be detached with comparatively greater ease from the larger body of texts, and indeed from the world itself, to become the ground for analysis of compositional minutiae; the pedagogical advantage was, of course, that such analyses of short lyrics could fit rather neatly into one hour in the undergraduate classroom. This pedagogical advantage, and the attendant detachment of ‘Literature’ from the crises and combats of real life, served also to conceal the ideology of some of the leading lights of ‘New Criticism’ who were quaintly called ‘Agrarian Populist’ but were really bourgeois gentlemen of rhe New South, the cultural heirs of the old slaveowning class. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 222

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s strategic-essentialism research as an instance of how a putatively neutral aesthetic method (detachment, reification) masks material/class position — parallel to Ahmad’s broader claim that discourse-first moves obscure material structures. — connects to: Formalist literary criticism fetishizes form and erases real-world activism — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism
, 88; Archetypal literary analysis can attend to historical and ideological circumstances; Genre form refracts rather than directly reflects political ideology — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 321
  • ADDENDUM: The detaching of ‘Literature’ from ‘crises and combats of real life’ as an ideological concealment parallels the immodesty-panic and sacrifice articles’ interest in how cultural forms encode class politics.

Broader Connections