For Sartre all relations with others serve self-protection and self-foundation

Evidence

My fundamental project toward the other— whatever may be the attitude I assume— is twofold: fi rst there is the problem of protecting myself against the danger which is incurred by my being-outside-in-the-Other’s-freedom, and second there is the problem of utilizing the other in order fi nally to totalize the detotalized totality which I am, so as to close the open circle, and fi nally to be my own foundation. — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 631

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the core Sartrean structure of relations to the Other: protective and totalizing, not reciprocal.
  • XREF: Connects to the broader Beauvoir–Sartre authorship debate — whether this ‘detotalized totality’ framing shows Sartrean or shared vocabulary. — connects to: Sartre’s freedom model subordinates others while Beauvoir’s requires affirming their freedom — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 633; Sartre holds that even capitulating to the Other expresses free subjectivity. — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 642; Sartre’s denial of ontological being-for-others grounds his hostile intersubjectivity — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 656 (+1 more)

Broader Connections