Feminism rupturally reorganized Cultural Studies’ object, power, and subjectivity.

Evidence

For Cultural Studies (in addition to many other theoretical projects), the intervention of feminism was specific and decisive. It was ruptural. It reorganized the field in quite concrete ways. First, the opening of the question of the personal as political, and its consequences for changing the object of study in Cultural Studies, was completely revolutionary in a theoretical and practical way. Second, the radical expansion of the notion of power, which had hitherto been very much developed within the framework of the notion of the public, the public domain, with the effect that we could not use the term power—so key to the earlier problematic of hegemony—in the same way. Third, the centrality of questions of gender and sexuality to the understanding of power itself. Fourth, the opening of many of the questions that we thought we had abolished around the dangerous area of the subjective and the subject, which lodged those questions at the center of Cultural Studies as a theoretical practice. Fifth, the “re-opening” of the closed frontier between social theory and the theory of the unconscious—psychoanalysis. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 248

Categorization

  • XREF: Detail on how feminism expanded ‘power’ beyond its prior hegemony framing; relevant to hegemonic-theory readings and economics of the domestic/private sphere. — connects to: Cultural Studies history is interrupted by exterior forces, not unfolded internally; Feminism rupturally reorganized Cultural Studies across five concrete dimensions; Benignly invited feminism exposed unadmitted patriarchal power inside Cultural Studies (+2 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 248

Broader Connections