Fascist Italy and liberal Britain both paired market coercion with state repression of labor

Evidence

Mussolini’s industrial austerity forced underpaid work on Italy’s population through a form of political coercion that was unthinkable in Britain: the Duce outlawed independent unions and slashed wages by decree. However, intersections between the two examples are abundant. In fact, the austere British government did not fear enacting explicit, repressive labor laws against strikers to complement the economic coercions imposed by the market. On the other hand, once unemployment rose, the Italian state’s violent political attacks on dissenting workers were complemented by the economic coercion of impersonal market forces. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 1519

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects chapter 7’s account of Fascist deflationary turn to the broader claim that austerity as class weapon spans democratic and authoritarian regimes — the core throughline of this book. — connects to: Wartime necessity forced both Britain and Italy to abandon free-market capitalist dogma.; Italian economists equated strong government with authoritarian repression to protect markets. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1181; Fascist Italy suppressed independent unions to enforce collaboration in production — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1728 (+5 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The convergence of dictatorial and parliamentary states on the same dual coercion (state violence plus market discipline) is a genuinely paradigm-shifting observation about how class power is exercised across regime types.

Broader Connections