Experimental results in psychoacoustics depend on the measurement procedure used

Evidence

Results obtained in psychoacoustical experiments generally depend on the procedure used. As a rule the sensitivity of a subject is enhanced if a comparison among several alternatives is possible. Concerning the measurement time and efficiency of the different procedures, methods which directly yield an estimate, such as adjustment, tracking or magnitude estimation, are very time efficient. However, with procedures which require a psychometric function like “yes-no” and “multiple alternative forced-choice” procedures, it takes many trials, and hence much time to arrive at stable results. With respect to adaptive procedures, the time necessary to arrive at a psychoacoustically meanigful value depends significantly on the details of the algorithm implemented. A compromise has to be found between the final step size and the number of trials necessary, because higher accuracy, i.e. a smaller step size, goes with a larger number of trials. — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 119

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

• XREF: Connects to Stevens’ and Fechner’s methodological debates about scaling procedures.

Related

• Psychoacoustic results depend on experimental procedure and sensitivity rises with alternatives. (similarity 0.95)
• Auditory experimentation resembles measuring an unreliable device against an unpredictable system (similarity 0.81)
• Adaptive loudness scaling requires roughly 15 times fewer trials than fixed-level procedures. (similarity 0.80)
• Adaptive staircase procedures trade efficiency and bias avoidance against convergence risk (similarity 0.80)
• Psychoacoustic findings often lack known anatomical or physical mechanisms (similarity 0.80)
• Hearing-impaired listeners vary more than normal hearers in quiet threshold, complicating averaging (similarity 0.80)
• Controlled experimentation is how psychoacoustics gets knowledge from subjective reports (similarity 0.79)
• Adaptive staircase procedures converge to thresholds by adjusting signal level per answer (similarity 0.79)
• Adaptive step size must be smaller than the psychometric function’s range (similarity 0.79)
• Simple forced-choice listening tests order noise samples by annoyance (similarity 0.79)
• Accuracy and function-shape information trade off against speed in threshold measurement (similarity 0.79)
• Listening-test statistics must inform experimental design from the outset (similarity 0.79)
• Detecting statistical changes in sound improves with listening time and change size (similarity 0.79)
• Psychoacoustics studies higher auditory functions where physiology is unknown (similarity 0.79)
• Constant-stimuli threshold measurement is time consuming because many trials are needed per level. (similarity 0.78)