Every consensus stabilizes irreducible chaos, and permanent stability would end politics

Evidence

Undecidability, he says. is not a moment to be traversed or overcome, and conflicts of duty are interminable. … It is in that sense that deconstruction can be said to be ‘hypcrpoliticizing’. Politicization never ceases because undecidability continues to inhabit the decision. Every consensus appears as a stabilization of something essentially unstable and chaotic. Chaos and instability are irreducible, but this is at once a risk and a chance, since continual stability would mean the end of politics and ethics. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 586

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Conflation of descriptive undecidability with normative political value — the strongest formulation yet of why the constitutive outside cannot be dialectically overcome.
  • XREF: connects to: Social division is constitutive and cannot be explained by any positive ground — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 604; Subtracting distortion from a discursive field would cause the field to disintegrate — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 596; Democratic consensus is always the crystallization of hegemonic power relations, never neutral agreement — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 223 (+7 more)

Broader Connections