Even neuroscience’s own descriptions can reinforce the ideological screen.

Evidence

By ā€screenā€ I mean both the clicheĀ“ representations that I have just analyzed and the (only apparently) more ā€nobleā€ resistances mounted against the neurosciences—more precisely against the cognitive sciences—by the majority of philosophers, psychoanalysts, and intellectuals in general. ā€Screenā€ also applies to the scientific descriptions themselves, which, pretending to lift the screen, really just reinforce it by producing no critical analysis of the worldview they implicitly drive. — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 137

Categorization

  • XREF: Adds a third layer to the reader’s caution: even well-meaning neuroscience prose can smuggle in the neo-liberal worldview. Reinforces the vigilance needed when reading management memos citing brain science.
  • QUESTION: How does one distinguish genuine neuroscience that resists the worldview from descriptions that ā€˜pretend to lift the screen’? Worth chasing.