Evangelical leaders redefined Trump’s religious ignorance as forgivable infancy

Evidence

Less than a month before the Republican Convention, Dobson, who had initially endorsed Cruz, testified on behalf of Trump’s nascent faith. Granted, the candidate didn’t exactly talk the talk. ā€œHe used the word ā€˜hell’ four or five timesā€ in his meeting with conservative Christian leaders, Dobson acknowledged, and ā€œhe doesn’t know our language.ā€ And yes, he’d had a rough time on the campaign trail, getting tripped up on questions about whether he’d ever asked for forgiveness (no), or what his favorite Bible verse was (ā€œI don’t want to get into specificsā€). But Dobson had on good authority that Trump had recently come ā€œto accept a relationship with Christ.ā€ He was, in Dobson’s words, ā€œa baby Christian.ā€ When it came to Trump’s obvious shortcomings, Dobson urged evangelicals to ā€œcut him some slack.ā€ — Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Jesus and John Wayne, 588

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the ā€˜baby Christian’ pattern described earlier in the book of leaders excusing political failings through spiritualized rhetoric; connects to the broader militant-masculinity framework where strength trumps theological fluency. — connects to: Evangelical leaders defended Trump’s moral scandals as a political trade-off for cultural power. — Andrew L. Whitehead; Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God, 230
  • DEFINE: Illustrates how evangelical leaders’ Trump endorsement entailed redefining what authentic Christian identity required — orthopraxy shifted from theological knowledge to stature.