Euphemistic names let dispersants double as biocides compounding harm

Evidence

Corexit sounds like a first cousin of Tippex, one brush stroke away from a simple whiteout, a fresh chance to rewrite past mistakes. But with a runaway gusher there is no simple corrective stroke and no exit. Corexit is so far from a problem solver that it is banned in the UK; the evidence suggests the product will operate less as a dispersant than (in Rachel Carson’s term) a biocide. So in addressing the slow violence in the Gulf of Mexico we return to the vanishing acts performed by a name: Agent Orange as “herbicide” that continues to poison down the generations; “cluster bombs” that disperse their staggered casualties across the years; “Corexit” that through tide and wave action, ocean currents, and chemical diffusion, compounds a calamity it purports to redress. — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 830

Categorization

  • XREF: Rejoins the chapter 1 claim about rhetorical unmasking of euphemism being central to exposing industrial harm. — connects to: Euphemistic labeling whitewashes the harm of secondhand smoke; Euphemistic labeling lets industries obscure the harm they do — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 839; Euphemistic labeling and relative comparisons sanitized silicosis hazards — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 1795 (+2 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Supports the ‘Complaints About Immodesty’ and trees articles only loosely; better as a direct partner to the Grafting article’s treatment of naming-as-power, if at all.

Broader Connections