Environmental harm is a product of human activity carrying a moral obligation

Evidence

The most urgent issue facing humankind in this century is the preservation of a sustainable environmental future. Harm to the earth is largely a product of human activity. All societies, therefore, have a moral obligation to preserve the environment so that future generations have a habitable planet. — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement, 2505

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

Related

• Major environmental degradation is quantifiable and undeniably human-caused (similarity 0.86)
• Attributing environmental harm to nature absolves people of moral self-assessment. (similarity 0.84)
• Some human-caused environmental changes prove uncontrollable and irreversible (similarity 0.83)
• Environmental degradation harms present and future citizens non-arbitrarily (similarity 0.83)
• Environmentally sustainable futures require norm-changing values, not incremental fixes (similarity 0.82)
• Environmental degradation combines population, per-capita consumption, and technology damage (similarity 0.82)
• Environmental harm is legitimized by framing it as serving national and economic goods (similarity 0.82)
• Cumulative individual environmental impacts constitute a moral, not merely economic, concern (similarity 0.82)
• Ecological interdependence makes species destruction endanger all life including humans (similarity 0.81)
• Current population and consumption already exceed Earth’s carrying capacity (similarity 0.80)
• Humanity’s demands exceeded the biosphere’s regenerative capacity by 1999. (similarity 0.80)
• Cumulative individual environmental behaviors become moral issues once they harm distant others (similarity 0.80)
• Curbing excessive consumption is the environmental remedy failing most badly (similarity 0.79)
• Global carbon emissions currently exceed what ecological systems can absorb (similarity 0.79)
• Ignoring population growth’s role in environmental harm is a moral failure of omission (similarity 0.79)