Enlightenment thinkers grounded antisemitism in progressive secular ideology, not religious prejudice.

Evidence

The now dominant form of antisemitism is a product of theory, not of elementary experience; it is supported by the process of teaching and learning, not by intellectually unprocessed responses to the context of daily interaction. … Yet there was no road leading from such heterophobia or even boundary-drawing anxiety of the masses, in a way a ‘private affair’ of the lower classes, to sophisticated antisemitic theories of universal ambitions, like this of a deadly race or the ‘world conspiracy’. To capture popular imagination, such theories much refer to facts normally inaccessible and unknown to the masses and certainly not located within the realm of their daily and unmediated experience. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 229 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Zionism thus became the Promethean passion of Jews in the modern era. — David Ohana, David Maisel , The Origins of Israeli…, 39 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Modern antisemitism is a learned theoretical product, not raw experience. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 229; Modern Jewish nationalism emerged from Enlightenment contradictions. — David Ohana, David Maisel , The Origins of Israeli…, 39; Enlightenment antislavery coexisted with racist assumptions about Africans (+1 more)

Broader Connections