Enlightenment philosophers wavered between rational and superstitious treatments of Muhammad

Evidence

For Enlightenment philosophers, there is evidence of what Benedict Robinson has called a “crisis of representation,” the struggle between humanism and the imagination evident in the treatment of Muhammad and Islam in general, which wavers between a measured rationalism and polemical superstition. Leibniz was one of several philosophers who faced this crisis in his writings: Was Muhammad an enlightened thinker, a medieval humanist, or a force of destruction and evil? — Sophia Rose Arjana, Muslims in the Western Imagination, 360

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘crisis of representation’ as the Enlightenment’s split stance on Islam.
  • QUESTION: This could feed the reader’s thesis that even ‘rational’ Western philosophers could not hold a stable image of Muhammad — worth quoting as evidence of manufactured ambivalence.
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Sophia Rose Arjana, Muslims in the Western Imagination, 360
  • XREF: connects to: Enlightenment thinkers retained older anti-Muslim stereotypes — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 161; Boulainvilliers reframed Muhammad as an Enlightenment deist — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 165; Enlightenment science and Romanticism both renewed medieval Muslim-monster fantasies rather than ending them (+7 more)

Broader Connections