Ending legal discrimination merely substituted white preference for explicit exclusion

Evidence

Ironically, this is a shift that took place after it became illegal to discriminate against black homebuyers. Remember, when the FHA explicitly endorsed and promoted all-white neighborhoods, black families actually paid more for their homes because they had so few options to choose from; the prices they paid increased surrounding property values. After the passage of the Fair Housing Act, supply could no longer be legally restricted, and more neighborhoods became available to black buyers. However, with explicit discrimination prohibited, another insidious factor remained: white preferences and fears, stoked by realtors and developers who wanted to drive out white homeowners and buy up their properties. When black families moved in, developers warned white families their property values would fall—and then, when they left and sold their homes at a loss, they did. — Dorothy A. Brown, Getting to Reparations, 1265

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

  • ADDENDUM: Directly extends the ‘On Sacrifice’ logic — the mechanism of harm persists across regime change; here legal reform converts overt exclusion into market-driven devaluation while preserving the black wealth penalty.