Embedded observation immerses researchers in workers’ daily lives for deeper data

Evidence

The four authors themselves were among the team of interviewers, and they got to know each workplace in detail and spent nine months in the hostel for single people that belonged to the works. Six other interviewers also familiarized themselves with the workplaces of the workers they were to interview. The interviews consisted of discussions lasting at least two hours, and often considerably longer. The pattern of questions had been assembled on the basis of numerous conversations at the workplace, in the hostel, in private homes and in bars. Most of the interviews took place in the works, usually in rooms set aside for the purpose. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 2098

Categorization

  • XREF: Contrasts with the Mannesmann study’s DIVO subcontracting and connects to ethnography-as-method debates in the shop-floor studies literature. — connects to: Real-world observation can directly seed a testable research hypothesis; Participant observation yields deeper portraits of mentality than verbal survey data do — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 369; Observational learning requires attention, representation, production, and motivation — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 728 (+2 more)

Broader Connections