Egyptian nationalists denied Sudan’s colonial status by framing it as part of Egypt.
Evidence
Sha
rawï repeated all the Wafd's ideas about the Sudan, saying, "We must hold on to our rights with respect to the issue of the Sudan, considering the Sudan an inseparable part of Egypt, and not a colony." … In one such letter, sent to the press on 24 March 1924 she berates Zaghlül,"who knows as every one else knows that Egypt cannot tolerate her soldiers being forced out of the Sudan." — <cite>Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 856</cite> (#corroborates`, via linked claim)
Categorization
- corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim
- XREF: connects to: Egyptian nationalists construed the Sudan as an organic part of Egypt, not a colony; Egyptian nationalists treated slavery as Egypt’s internal matter with Sudan; Egyptian nationalists rejected the condominium’s equal-partner premise (+10 more)
Related
- Egyptian nationalists construed the Sudan as an organic part of Egypt, not a colony (similarity 0.97)
- Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan as part of Egypt while denying it was a colony (similarity 0.97)
- Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan as inseparable from Egypt while denouncing British imperialism (similarity 0.96)
- Egyptian nationalists redefined the Sudan as part of Egypt to mask colonial domination (similarity 0.94)
- Egyptian nationalists claimed primacy among all colonizers of Sudan. (similarity 0.94)
- Egyptian nationalists rejected the condominium’s equal-partner premise (similarity 0.93)
- Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan for Egypt yet felt it alien and unhomelike. (similarity 0.92)
- Egyptian nationalists regarded Sudan as an inseparable part of Egypt, not a colony. (similarity 0.90)
- Egyptian nationalists regarded the Sudan as Egyptian property to be reconquered. (similarity 0.90)
- Egyptian nationalism combined British colonization with eagerness to recolonize the Sudan (similarity 0.89)
- Egyptian nationalism combined anti-imperialism with its own imperial claims over Sudan (similarity 0.89)
- Kamil asserted Egyptian legal title to the Sudan over British claims (similarity 0.89)
- Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan as their own colony by right of conquest (similarity 0.88)
- Al-Afghani sought an Arab empire but still claimed Sudan for Egypt. (similarity 0.87)
- Egyptian nationalists could simultaneously enforce and suffer colonialism. (similarity 0.87)
Broader Connections
- Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan as part of Egypt while denying it was a colony
#corroborates(0.95) — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 856 - Egyptian nationalists redefined the Sudan as part of Egypt to mask colonial domination
#corroborates(0.90) - Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan as inseparable from Egypt while denouncing British imperialism
#corroborates(0.80) - Egyptian nationalism combined anti-imperialism with its own imperial claims over Sudan
#expands(0.70) - Egyptian nationalists claimed Sudan for Egypt yet felt it alien and unhomelike.
#qualifies(0.60) - Egyptian nationalists regarded the Sudan as Egyptian property to be reconquered.
#expands(0.60) - Egyptian nationalism combined anticolonial critique with imperial condescension toward Sudan.
#expands(0.60) - Colonial unity with Sudan never felt like home even to its Egyptian advocates
#complicates(0.50) - Egyptian nationalists rejected British conflating Sudan’s chaos with Egypt’s occupation.
#expands(0.40)