Economics is lateral to governing, not its internal rationality

Evidence

Political economy is indeed a science, a type of knowledge (savoir), a mode of knowledge (connaissance) which those who govern must take into account. But economic science cannot be the science of government and economics cannot be the internal principle, law, rule of conduct, or rationality of government. Economics is a science lateral to the art of governing. One must govern with economics, one must govern alongside economists, one must governby listening to the economists, but economics must not be and there is no question that it can be the governmental rationality itself. — Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics, 1467

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the key Foucaultian distinction: economics as a science ‘lateral to the art of governing,’ never government’s own rationality.
  • XREF: This ‘lateral’ relation of economic science to government anticipates Foucault’s later account of liberal governmentality and the critique of ‘economism’ in government. — connects to: Economics serves power more effectively when it operates in innocence of serving it — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 241; Governments conflate capitalist economic rationality with rationality itself. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 369; Public legitimacy of economics rests on its predictive and prescriptive authority — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 679 (+13 more)

Broader Connections