Dominant groups use systematic terror most ferociously when subordinates challenge them

Evidence

The resulting institutional structure may take a variety of forms as it evolves strategically in response to the specific exigencies that dominants confront, but it is designed to provide a continuing flow of benefits by constraining subordinates’ options. Ensnared subordinates, from their weaker position, are driven to follow strategies that are directed toward protecting their current holdings from further incursions, while working to ameliorate or improve their conditions of life when opportunity permits. Expropriative institutions also inevitably embroil the practice of violence, but it too is organized so as to co-opt rather than alienate subordinates. — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 667 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Fear-driven groups become the very threat they fear — Andrew L. Whitehead, American Idolatry, 417; Terror is a strategy of asymmetric violence deployable by weak or strong actors — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 828; High-capacity governments hold near-monopolies of terror but use it sparingly — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 892 (+9 more)

Broader Connections

• Dominant-group violence is deliberately calibrated to co-opt rather than alienate subordinates #complicates (0.78) — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 667