Domestic radicals and foreign jihadists are morally disengaged in different ways.

Evidence

There is no one pathway to domestic radicalization. Some who resort to violence view the federal government as a tyrannical force that is dismissive of “traditional” American values and that threatens their safety, freedom, and way of life. Antigovernment talk radio outlets and blogs abound with stories of diabolical conspiracies, fueling their wrath. Some white supremacists take up arms against the government. — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement, 2247

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2247
• XREF: connects to: Terrorists use sacred, utilitarian, and personal grievance justifications to disengage morally. — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2136; For many Islamist radicals the internal enemy takes priority over foreign ones; Terrorists engage morality to justify their mission while disengaging it for lethal acts — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2253 (+4 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Terrorists use sacred, utilitarian, and personal grievance justifications to disengage morally. — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2136; For many Islamist radicals the internal enemy takes priority over foreign ones; Terrorists engage morality to justify their mission while disengaging it for lethal acts — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2253 (+4 more)