Disputing a method can serve to deny the phenomenon the method reveals.

Evidence

Presumably because of the poorly disguised polemical nature of HofstĂ€tter’s criticisms, Adorno was given an opportunity to reply in the same issue. In his conclusion, he stated clearly what the core of the dispute was: The method is declared to be useless so that the existence of the phenomenon that emerges can be denied.' He exposed HofstĂ€tter's discussion of exposures’ and `accusations’ as an appeal to collective narcissism: the condemnation of mechanisms and of an ideology that had been beaten into people was represented as a condemnation of individuals, so as to stir them up against it. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 2043

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Adorno’s insight that ‘the method is declared useless so that the existence of the phenomenon that emerges can be denied’ is a generalizable epistemic tactic — attacking methodology to suppress unwelcome findings — applicable well beyond this dispute.
  • XREF: connects to: Repeating a false claim to debunk it increases its plausibility — Holm Gero HĂŒmmler, Ulrike Schiesser, Fact and Prejudice: How to Communicate
, 164; Contradicting false claims serves the claimant, not just the audience — Holm Gero HĂŒmmler, Ulrike Schiesser, Fact and Prejudice: How to Communicate
, 805; Being deceived by a psychological test can inoculate people against trusting test results. — Bob Altemeyer, The Authoritarian Specter, 1854 (+3 more)

Broader Connections